AI Comparatives

Claude Sonnet 3.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4

Compare Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 3.7 and Claude Sonnet 4, explore key upgrades in reasoning, contextual memory, and user experience to find the best AI model for your needs.

Claude Sonnet 3.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 3.7 and the newer Claude Sonnet 4 both aim to deliver strong performance across reasoning, creativity, and task completion, but with key upgrades in the latest release.

Claude Sonnet 3.7 set a solid foundation with reliable language understanding and fast responses. Claude Sonnet 4 builds on that with improved contextual memory, deeper reasoning, and more natural conversation flow, making it better suited for complex tasks and longer interactions.

In this article, we compare Claude Sonnet 3.7 and Sonnet 4 across several dimensions, speed, accuracy, coding ability, and overall user experience, to help you decide which model best fits your needs.

Specifications and Technical Details

Model Claude Sonnet 3.7 Claude Sonnet 4
Alias claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219 claude-sonnet-4-20250514
Description (provider) Our most intelligent model to date and the first hybrid reasoning model on the market. Our high-performance model with exceptional reasoning and efficiency
Release date February 2025 22 May 2025
Developer Anthropic Anthropic
Primary use cases RAG, search & retrieval, code generation, content creation code generation, advanced AI chatbots, knowledge and Q&A
Context window 200k tokens 200k tokens
Max output tokens 8192 tokens 64k
Knowledge cutoff November 2024 March 2025
Multimodal Accepted input: text, image Accepted input: text, image
Fine tuning No No

Sources:

Performance Benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4 significantly outperforms Sonnet 3.7 in software engineering, scoring 72.7% (or 80.2% with parallel compute) on SWE-bench versus 62.3% (70.3% with compute) for 3.7. It also dominates in high school-level math (AIME), achieving 70.5% / 85.0% compared to Sonnet 3.7’s 54.8%.

In contrast, Sonnet 3.7 slightly edges out Sonnet 4 in graduate-level reasoning (78.2% vs 75.4%) and visual reasoning (75.0% vs 74.4%). Both perform similarly in multilingual Q&A (~86%) and agentic tool use (Retail: ~81%, Airline: ~59–60%).

Overall, Sonnet 4 is clearly stronger for technical and coding-intensive tasks, while Sonnet 3.7 remains competitive in reasoning and general-purpose use.

Sources:

Practical Applications and Use Cases

Claude 3.7 Sonnet  :

  • Developer Support: Enhances engineering workflows with contextual code generation, smart debugging assistance, and natural language explanations of complex codebases.
  • Business Operations: Streamlines data handling by summarizing documents, extracting key insights from emails, and efficiently organizing feedback or survey results.
  • Customer Engagement: Serves as a responsive virtual assistant, resolving service queries promptly and professionally, contributing to a smoother and more satisfying user experien

Claude Sonnet 4

  • Code Generation: Powers end-to-end software development with high performance in planning, writing, debugging, and refactoring code—ideal for complex, agentic programming workflows.
  • Customer-Facing AI: Delivers advanced reasoning, precise tool use, and strong instruction following—perfect for intelligent, reliable customer service agents and AI-driven support systems.
  • Knowledge Q&A: Handles large documents and codebases with ease, offering accurate, low-hallucination responses thanks to its large context window and refined comprehension.

Using the Models with APIs

For developers interested in building custom AI solutions with Claude Sonnet 3.7 and 4, they are available on the Anthropic API, Amazon Bedrock, and Google Cloud's Vertex AI.

Accessing APIs Directly

Claude 3.7 request example

Python request example for chat with Anthropic API:

import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic(
    # defaults to os.environ.get("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY")
    api_key="my_api_key",
)
message = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[
        {"role": "user", "content": "Hello, Claude"}
    ]
)
print(message.content)

Claude 4 request example

Python request example for chat with Anthropic API:


import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic(
    # defaults to os.environ.get("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY")
    api_key="my_api_key",
)
message = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[
        {"role": "user", "content": "Hello, Claude"}
    ]
)
print(message.content)

Streamlined Access to Claude Models with Eden AI

Eden AI offers a unified platform to easily access Claude Sonnet 3.7 and Claude Sonnet 4 through a single, simplified API, eliminating the need to manage multiple keys or complex integrations. This makes it easier than ever to deploy powerful Claude models in your applications, with built-in support for custom data sources via an intuitive UI and Python SDK.

Designed with developers in mind, Eden AI provides transparent, usage-based pricing with no hidden fees or subscription costs. You pay only for what you use, with unlimited API call volume and clear supplier-side margins.

Whether you're building with Claude Sonnet 3.7’s balanced reasoning or Claude Sonnet 4’s high-performance capabilities, Eden AI helps teams scale AI-powered solutions efficiently with robust monitoring tools to track performance and ensure reliability at every step.

Eden AI Example Workflow

Python request (multimodal chat) example for chat with Eden AI API:

import requests

url = "https://api.edenai.run/v2/multimodal/chat"

payload = {
    "fallback_providers": ["DeepSeek-R1"],
    "response_as_dict": True,
    "attributes_as_list": False,
    "show_base_64": True,
    "show_original_response": False,
    "temperature": 0,
    "max_tokens": 16384,
    "providers": ["claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219"]
}
headers = {
    "accept": "application/json",
    "content-type": "application/json"
}

response = requests.post(url, json=payload, headers=headers)

print(response.text)

Cost Analysis

Cost (per 1M tokens) Claude Sonnet 3.7 Claude Sonnet 4
Input $3 $3
Output $15 $15

Claude Sonnet 3.7 and Claude Sonnet 4 have the same pricing: $3 per 1M input tokens and $15 per 1M output tokens. This means there’s no cost difference between the two models.

Users can upgrade to Claude Sonnet 4 for improved performance without paying extra, making it a straightforward, value-focused choice.

Conclusion

Claude Sonnet 4 represents a significant upgrade over Claude Sonnet 3.7, with enhanced reasoning, a vastly expanded output token limit, and improved performance in coding and complex task handling.

Both models share the same pricing and support multimodal inputs, making Claude Sonnet 4 a clear value proposition for users seeking more advanced capabilities without additional cost.

Whether for developers, businesses, or customer service applications, Claude Sonnet 4’s improved context handling and natural interaction make it the better choice for demanding AI workflows and longer conversations, while Claude 3.7 remains a reliable option for solid general performance.

Start Your AI Journey Today

  • Access 100+ AI APIs in a single platform.
  • Compare and deploy AI models effortlessly.
  • Pay-as-you-go with no upfront fees.
Start building FREE

Related Posts

Try Eden AI for free.

You can directly start building now. If you have any questions, feel free to chat with us!

Get startedContact sales
X

Start Your AI Journey Today

Sign up now with free credits to explore 100+ AI APIs.
Get my FREE credits now